Light Scattering and Absorption
by Bubbles
One of the main sources of bias in the images collected
using this visualization technique to measure shear stress
within wave crests is the scattering and absorption of photons
by the bubbles entrained by breaking. A plate illustrating
the effects of scattering is shown in Figure 4. The figure
is plotted in false color to emphasize light level contours.
The white and blue elongated regions correspond to the tracks
of light produced by flashing dinoflagellates as they moved
past the camera. The red granular regions surrounding the
plankton tracks are the result of light scattered from microbubbles
in the wave crest. These low levels of light do not occur
in regions where microbubbles are absent. For example, the
tracks in the box ‘‘A’’ (Figure 4)
are behind the actively breaking wave crest in a region with
few bubbles [Deane and Stokes, 2002], and do not exhibit low-light
granularity. The effects of scattering are removed by subtracting
the mean scattering intensity from the images (thresholding).
This is a subjective procedure: the intensity level used here
was determined by examining a number of imagesand selecting
a level that removed most of the granular region. This same
threshold level was applied to all images includ-ing those
used to calibrate the cell emission intensity. The result
of thresholding is shown in the right hand plate in Figure
4. The effects of light absorption by bubbles depends on the
transmission path length through the bubbly mixture. An opaque
divider was added to the wave flume specifically to limit
the length of the transmission path and minimize the effects
of absorption by bubble occlusion (see Figure 1a). [26] These
measures combined with the reasonable agree-ment between quantitative
analysis of shear stress levels and those expected to exist
on the basis of the work of ourselves and others, albeit for
a limited data set, helps justify our treatment of scattering
and absorption. A more rigorous evaluation of bubble effects
could be made by imaging a calibrated light source inside
a breaking wave crest and this will be done in future experiments.

Figure 2. Image montage
showing an example breaking wave (left), bioluminescence intensity
images (center), and shear stress (right) calculated from
the cell firing model. Intensity images and shear stress images
have been averaged over 5 video frames. The wave in the image
is moving from left to right. Regions of high shear stress
are associated with the collapse of the overturning wave jet
(top) and the turbulent eddy formed in the secondary splash-up
in front of the wave crest
Conclusion
The formulation of a statistical model of dinoflagel-late
cell firing behavior and the development of a calibration
technique (bioluminescence imaging) has allowed us to produce
quantitative images of the evolving fluid shear stress field
within breaking wave crests. The images show high rates of
turbulent energy dissipation in the jet/wave face interaction
region consistent with earlier optical observations. The technique
is based on two parts: a statistical model for single cell
flashing behavior and its relationship to fluid shear, and
a calibration methodology for analyzing images. The fundamental
assumption in the statistical model is expressed by equation
(1), which states that over some small time interval, the
probability that a cell flashes is proportional to time. An
additional assumption is that cells produce a detectable flash
only once (a good assumption for some, but not for all species).
When applied to populations of cells, the statistical model
produces results consistent with available biological data
for the special case of constant shear stress; the case of
time-varying shear remains to be examined. Cells flash in
response to many kinds of stimulation; the focus here is on
stimulation induced by fluid shear. The model we have adopted
relating the anxiety parameter to shear includes a known thresholding
effect, but does not account for any effects caused by rate
of change of fluid shear or cell memory. In principle, these
effects could be included in equation (15), but the experiments
required to understand their importance have not yet been
undertaken. Finally, the calibration methodology presented
here has only partially accounted for the effects of bubble
absorption and scattering. Again, further measurements are
required to better eliminate these biases. Bioluminescence
imaging has the potential to significantly impact a broad
range of hydrodynamic research areas, including transient,
turbulent, two-phase flows. Ultimately, it may be possible
to use cell bioluminescence to study wave turbulence in the
open ocean and surf zone by calibrating the statistical model
using bioluminescent species common to coastal red tides.
In principle, aerial observations of flow-induced bioluminescence
offer an unprecedented advantage to point measurements and
would provide an instantaneous, synoptic view of highly dissipa-tive
events over large areas of the ocean surface [Rohr et al.,
2002].